Bomb Bomb Bombala Harris

It's been worse fascist that you are actively capitulating to.

We can't have that.

This is the fundamental difference.

This is what needs to change.

The Democrats appear to have no counter to the system Democrats missed the next

generation

of media says Brandon Gann, quote, co-founder of influencer marketing agency.

I know him, uh, creator authority historically, they own Hollywood, but this

next generation

influence is digital and they've miscalculated that.

I don't think they feel comfortable in arenas where they lack control.

I guess that's it.

The entire article from Taylor Lorenz, fantastic article, uh, fantastic article

, um, obviously,

uh, current affairs had a complimentary piece on this as well.

This explains this also explains why some of the most popular progressive

content critters

refused to ever cover Gaza.

This is from current affairs, a separate piece that came out that we read a

while back.

The decision to avoid Palestine by democratic aligned media seems to be

deliberate and

it goes beyond Midas touch.

Midas touch is part of a broader universe of content critters that are aligned

with the

democratic party, including Brian Tyler Cohen, David Pakman, among others,

notably last

March, according to a source of the events, Pakman attended a private off the

record meeting

with Kamala Harris on the day of the Joe Biden state of the union address

during the trip

he met with Cohen, the Meisles brothers and dozens of other so-called

independent progressive

media figures in an internal email.

Pakman later told the staff that the content critters of the White House had

talked among

themselves and everyone admitted that they deliberately avoided producing Gaza

coverage

in order to prevent controversy.

One could argue that this is probably a big reason why these particular

influences were

invited to the White House in the first place.

Pakman, for his part, has previously asserted that Israel would never waste

ordinance on

Palestinian civilians that he views Congressman Richie Torres, who is perhaps

best known for

being one of APAC's top recipients of funding, APAC's biggest attack dog, which

we will be

watching on the Adam Friedland show later, Richie Torres, as the kind of person

who he

would like to see lead the progressive movement.

Karen Affairs also reported on the campaign, Harris campaign coordinators, i.e.

indirect

payments to influencers through the agency, special appearance from Cohen and

there too.

The New York Times has reported that the Harris campaign spent $2.5 million on

three digital

agencies that work with online influencers, and it appears that the influencer

in this

video may have been one of them.

They were just fucking melting money.

It's literally all connected 16 30 funds, future forwards, which funded

progressive victory.

It's a lib circle jerk.

They literally came to a consensus on the face.

They avoid talking about one of the worst made man made disaster of our time.

Yeah.

Their idea of controversy was acknowledging the 30 plus polls showing she

needed to stop

the genocide to win, by the way.

Here are 34 polls that show a ceasefire and weapons embargo to help Kamala

Harris win.

This was on the 21st of September, 2024.

It was a compilation of 34 different polls that showed that this issue would be

a mover

in a shaker.

And this is just the tip of the iceberg.

I talked about this quite a bit because not every single person was as invested

in Gaza

as others were, right?

They could recognize right from wrong that kind of animosity towards Israel

didn't expand

overnight, of course, that led to like the Zoron victory, for example, that

didn't happen

overnight.

That was already there in the lead up to the election, even though it was being

actively

sheltered, it was actively being pushed aside by top level Democrats and the

establishment

for obvious reasons because they wanted to continue the, the maximum genocide

that the,

the Joe Biden administration was doing now.

Having said that, the reason why I say this is the tip of the iceberg is

because this

was emblematic of the problem of the Democratic party's inability to address

real issues that

their fucking voters were experiencing.

This was just one of those issues.

It was a very big one, as Donna has, it goes correctly pointed out.

How can you expect the Democrats to save democracy when they won't even stop a

genocide?

How can you expect a party that will turn a blind eye to a genocide that they

are contributing

to to actually not turn a blind eye to the democracy, the democratic process

falling apart?

And he was right.

This is why it is mind boggling to me that there are still people who are

actively either

deluded by these other content creators that are getting paid by the Democratic

party to,

to actively advocate for the Democratic party's inevitable demise or the, the

death of American

democracy as it stands, the theoretical democracy that we are supposed to

ostensibly defend

here.

And one of those examples, I'm going to use two examples here, okay, which is

this one,

this guy sneer review, we are so cooked, it's not even funny, I said, who then

quote retweeted

me to say, bomb, bomb, bomb La Harris, to which I responded with 22 months into

the Gaza

Holocaust and pro-Israel lives still try to act as though the Dems didn't throw

the election

by pivoting right, refusing to listen to the anger people had about numerous

issues, including

the genocide and losing yet again to an incompetent fascist.

They are diluting themselves, they are fucking diluting themselves.

They're actively and deliberately diluting themselves.

They don't want to listen to the truth.

They don't want to listen to reason.

They don't want to make a proper analysis as to why they lost a otherwise winn

able election

is tough, but it was winnable.

Every election is.

It blows my mind that people still try to do this shit, especially when third

party voters,

if every single third party voter turned around and voted for Kamala Harris,

Kamala Harris

still would have lost the election.

So there isn't even like votes that you could have secured from the fucking

margins there.

So constantly fucking yelling about the left being a spoiler in this election

is idiotic.

It's just not true.

There is no amount of left commentary from myself and every other fucking left

this commentator

on the planet, right or wrong, by the way, doesn't matter if our criticisms are

right

or wrong, but there's no amount of criticism that we could present that could

outflank

the multi-billion dollar messaging campaign that Kamala Harris blew up with

shitty message.

And it's so indicative of their lack of interest in actually solving some of

the problems

that currently persist, whether it be Trump's active bouldering towards fascism

, for example,

then actively fighting against a guy who is trying to do his very best to

combat the administration.

If you're a fucking liberal, you should actually run around and say, I'm so

sorry, I was wrong,

you were fucking right.

Now I'm going to stand side by side with you because you already correctly

called this

shit out.

And even if you don't have to do that because you don't, you don't have to do

that, obviously.

Even if you don't do that and you don't have to do that, the least you could do

is shut

the fuck up and not try to consistently say this wrong thing that makes you

feel good

as though you did your very best and now you're tired, now you can sign off.

As people are getting black bagged and kidnapped, you can just sit on the

sidelines and yell

about the left.

If only the left voted for Kamala, this would not be happening.

It's so stupid.

It's also simple.

The problem is simple.

Republicans run away from their base, they despise their base.

Republicans run towards their base.

They fear their base.

That's it.

That's it.

Democrats actively try to convince their base that the things that they are

demanding are

actually bad and they should suck at the fuck up and vote for them anyway.

Republicans don't do that.

Republicans will find active issues that have grassroots backing, no matter how

insane

it is, like QAnon, and will find a way to make that a part of their platform,

okay?

They do that.

The greatest version of someone behaving like this is Zoram Mamdoni.

He went out there.

He asked people what their fucking problems were and he said, "I'm going to

solve them."

There it is.

You don't have to be a card-carrying communist to be able to do this, okay?

You just have to listen to people.

You just have to listen to their demands.

You just have to listen to what they want, okay?

I try my very best not the fucking fight with Democrats at this moment, but

they make

it so goddamn hard when they just like put the cross-airs on someone like

myself instead

of, instead of actively fighting in unison against the Trump administration and

also

maybe taking a cold, hard look at why they lost, okay?

It blows my mind.

It's just so fucking frustrating because this is, this is just a demonstration

of this person's

lack of interest in fixing any of these problems.

He just wants to appear right and he knows he's wrong, okay?

He knows he's wrong.

He knows he was wrong.

He wants to be pro-Israel and he wants to still present himself as a

progressive, even

though Israel's doing a genocide and the walls are closing in, so he just like

actively tries

to attack someone who was correct from the start, someone who was doing a lot

more than

he is in terms of trying to fucking fight against the Trump administration.