Democrats Are Bought by Israel and in General

the

roll call is not available so unless you go into C span, the live footage from

C span you're not going to be able to

figure out you're not going to be able to figure out whether or not

doors open

and

so I don't know why people are saying he leaves even is definitely voting on

this they saw it unless they were watching C span and

tracking it

More Democrats either didn't vote for or voted no 98 or present 10 on cutting

all aid to

Israel than Democrats that voted yes. That is that's it. It is a seismic shift

in U.S. foreign policy. 48% of the Democratic Caucus. Massey was the lone

Republican. Yes.

What was interesting is Pelosi actually voted yes. Nancy Pelosi says she will

vote yes on the Massey amendment to withhold aid from Israel.

This is obviously symbolic. This is obviously symbolic, but Nancy Pelosi

understands which way the winds are blowing. Okay.

This is important to recognize. It's important to understand that Nancy Pelosi

as Speaker Emerita.

One of the most impactful Democrats in Congress recognizes which way the the

room is the room temperature is shifting and is moving

along with it. She has all the power to just, you know, if she's out after this

, after this season, she has literally nothing to lose. If she wanted to, if she

wanted to, if she wanted to basically say, look, I want, I want to continue

funding Israel is very important.

Then she would have voted yes on this or I mean, she would have voted no on the

Massey amendment.

It's really interesting to scheme Jeffries is Nancy Pelosi's hand selected

candidate to run the Democratic Party in the, in the House of Representatives.

Today, the Massey amendment presents an unfortunate choice to the House as one

who was committed to a strong U.S. Israel relationship and a supportive and

supportive of a two state solution. I respect Leader Jeffries decides to

propose to achieve a just and lasting peace.

The United States must force must be a force for security and stability. The

American people are rightly demanding an end to perpetual cycle of war and the

Netanyahu government cannot maintain his current course. Therefore, while this

amendment is ill conceived, I vote yes for the message that it sends.

She knows it won't pass. If she was the lone deciding vote, of course, she

would vote in favor of it.

She's always been very savvy politically.

It's a PR move, but it's still one that signifies something changing.

I'm just saying it's, it's still obviously dog shit. And I need you guys to

understand this doesn't mean anything. And that's precisely the reason why

these guys even have the level of comfort to vote. No, for the most part with

the exception of like,

Summer Lee, AOC, Rokana, people like that. Like all the other, all of the other

100 Democrats that voted yes voted in favor of the Thomas Massey amendment that

that in the past have never taken a significant position against Israel are

doing so because they want the benefits of it.

Which means that the environment has shifted dramatically in our, to the side

of truth, to the side of justice, at least amongst the base.

That means there's such a tremendous amount of appetite for someone to actually

tell Israel to fuck off that 100 Democrats voted. I need you to understand in

comparison to where we were two years ago, three years ago, where we were 10

years ago. This is unfathomable. This is an unfathomable seismic shift.

Seismic shift that still is utterly meaningless in the grand scheme of things

because obviously the amendment was struck down because there's always enough

votes.

Just this morning, people were expecting 40 Democrat votes when we actually

actually got 100. That's movement, but not enough. Yes. And there will always

be spoilers. The Kim Jeffries will ensure that there's always spoilers

regardless.

We have to do is is mathematically make it impossible for them.

So we still have a long way to go. We still have a long way to go. Obviously

half of the Democrats are still bought and paid for by Israel. Half of the

Democrats are still bought and paid for in general.

Why did the Republicans vote? No. What do you mean? They're fucking dogs.

Why are you not teaching a streamer university? Because it's streamer

university every day in here where I'm teaching you geopolitical crises that

are taking place all around the world.

In any case, like I said, 74% of Democrat voters, 74% of Democratic party

voters want to cut off aid to Israel.

The fact that only half of the Democrats are comfortable with that is still

devastating.

What does any of these have to do with socialism?

You're right, buddy. You're right. Fuck the Palestinians, right?

Who cares about American foreign policy in the MENA region? Who cares about all

the Iranians dying, all the Lebanese people dying, all the death and

destruction that's taking place?

Are they all socialist? Good bait. Good bait. Thank you.

On Sheamus, Sheamus in Dillon's office podcast, Matt Petty said that the

Republican base is where the Dems were five years ago, but the trend line

suggests that most Americans will be opposed to Israel over the coming years.

Quite a departure from being ignorant to foreign policy. Yes.

Yes. But it's good. The sign of positivity here is that foreign policy is no

longer seen as a separate thing for the longest time. And it's not. It's not

separate.

Foreign policy and domestic policy are tied to one another. American

experiences here are impacted by our foreign policy over there. But for the

longest time, Americans did not make that connection.

Now they are Israel and the attitude shift against Israel has played a major

role in this. Okay.

Americans are more in tune with APAC. They're more aware of corporate pack

expenditures, more aware of a foreign policy apparatus, a foreign country's

influence on American elections. This is a good thing.

It's a it's a positive change. Obviously we're not there yet. And we have to

keep pushing. And it's incredibly important that we have to keep pushing.

What do you think that triggered that shift? 9/11? No, October 7 triggered that

shift.

Even with 9/11, Americans, by and large, were in support of the global war on

terror. And it took 20 years for them to recognize that it was an abject

failure. And then a lot of money was spent on it, that money could have been

spent on health care, for example.

But even then they weren't angry enough. Whereas now, now with the level of

frustration that is mounted against not only America's on this unbelievable

lesion that America has with this foreign country Israel, but its impact, its

direct impact on domestic concerns has frustrated Americans and have made them

realize.

Have made Americans realize that foreign policy and domestic policy is insepar

able. All the money that we're spending overseas could be spent here instead.

Okay. This is a good thing. This is not a bad thing. This is a good thing.

Everything that the government is doing, everything that the Democrats are

doing to control the situation is obviously another hurdle that we have to

fight back against, but always be cognizant of the fact that we have the people

.

Okay. And that's part of the reason why we can't let up. We can't feel

discouraged. We can't be nihilistic. We can't lean into like, idiotic, idiotic,

black-pilled narratives that change is not happening fast enough.

Okay. Roll call is up for the recorded vote for the Massey, the Massey

amendment.

Let's see what Stevens did.

Wait, it's not, it's, oh wait, it's in the nose. Yeah, Stevens also voted no.

There you go. Unsurprising. Expected.

I don't think this accurate. How are there 421 nose? Yeah, I don't know why

they're.

Yeah, it says 211 Democratic knows. I don't think that's correct.

It might be. Yeah, this might not be accurate.