WEBVTT

1
00:00:00.000 --> 00:00:03.440
I forgot for lemons, and on several occasions, I was like,

2
00:00:03.440 --> 00:00:06.240
"I'm just gonna go back grab those for lemons and get the hell out."

3
00:00:06.240 --> 00:00:07.760
- You should go to prison.

4
00:00:07.760 --> 00:00:09.200
- I know, you think they're gonna ban me?

5
00:00:09.200 --> 00:00:11.200
- They should throw you in jail.

6
00:00:11.200 --> 00:00:12.960
- But I didn't feel bad about it at all.

7
00:00:12.960 --> 00:00:20.000
- I'm proposing a new term, micro-looting.

8
00:00:20.000 --> 00:00:21.600
- I started going into the grocery store.

9
00:00:21.600 --> 00:00:24.240
I would pick up the thing and I wanted it, and then I would go.

10
00:00:24.240 --> 00:00:25.840
- It's a survival technique.

11
00:00:25.840 --> 00:00:29.040
Gotta eat a lick, gotta steal the eater pain for that, right?

12
00:00:29.040 --> 00:00:31.280
- No, babe, food is a human right.

13
00:00:31.280 --> 00:00:34.880
- People are taking small things from big corporations,

14
00:00:34.880 --> 00:00:37.920
and they're feeling justified.

15
00:00:37.920 --> 00:00:40.400
- Like, look, everyone's shoplifting from Whole Foods

16
00:00:40.400 --> 00:00:41.440
when you're shopping there.

17
00:00:41.440 --> 00:00:43.280
- But you're not gonna steal from a deli like that.

18
00:00:43.280 --> 00:00:45.360
- But Whole Foods, fuck Whole Foods,

19
00:00:45.360 --> 00:00:47.520
fuck basil, fuck Amazon, all that.

20
00:00:47.520 --> 00:00:49.680
- We should be rioting, but we're tired,

21
00:00:49.680 --> 00:00:51.440
so I'm gonna take these bagels.

22
00:00:51.440 --> 00:00:53.440
- But isn't a slippery slope?

23
00:00:53.440 --> 00:00:55.760
What's going on with our moral code?

24
00:00:55.760 --> 00:00:59.200
- To find out, I'm talking to political commentator Hassan Piker

25
00:00:59.200 --> 00:01:01.040
and New Yorker writer, Jaya Tolentino.

26
00:01:01.040 --> 00:01:04.000
- Thank you both so much for being here with me today

27
00:01:04.000 --> 00:01:05.120
to talk about this.

28
00:01:05.120 --> 00:01:05.840
Hi, Jaya.

29
00:01:05.840 --> 00:01:06.480
- Hi.

30
00:01:06.480 --> 00:01:07.120
- Hi, Hassan.

31
00:01:07.120 --> 00:01:08.080
- Hi.

32
00:01:08.080 --> 00:01:09.920
- I wanna start with a little exercise,

33
00:01:09.920 --> 00:01:12.240
just about our own morals.

34
00:01:12.240 --> 00:01:15.760
Would you share your Netflix password?

35
00:01:15.760 --> 00:01:17.440
- I do.

36
00:01:17.440 --> 00:01:19.440
- I also do, well, I--

37
00:01:19.440 --> 00:01:20.400
- With anyone.

38
00:01:20.400 --> 00:01:23.360
- For the longest time, I actually had someone else's

39
00:01:23.360 --> 00:01:26.240
Netflix password. That was my primary access to Netflix.

40
00:01:26.240 --> 00:01:28.160
- And now you share your own.

41
00:01:28.160 --> 00:01:28.640
- Yeah.

42
00:01:28.640 --> 00:01:31.360
- Would you get around to pay while I'm an article

43
00:01:31.360 --> 00:01:32.080
you're trying to read?

44
00:01:32.080 --> 00:01:36.000
- Do it every day on my stream every day.

45
00:01:36.000 --> 00:01:38.560
- Yeah, but I support it when people do it for my own work.

46
00:01:38.560 --> 00:01:39.520
I say, go off.

47
00:01:39.520 --> 00:01:41.840
Use the way back machine.

48
00:01:41.840 --> 00:01:44.160
- Would you pirate music from an indie band?

49
00:01:44.160 --> 00:01:49.600
- Is it 2005 and I'm using lime wire?

50
00:01:49.600 --> 00:01:50.320
Because yes.

51
00:01:50.320 --> 00:01:53.040
- I feel like every millennial has at some point.

52
00:01:54.320 --> 00:01:57.040
- I feel like fundamentally Spotify is kind of like

53
00:01:57.040 --> 00:02:00.800
deleterious to the musician livelihood and I use that.

54
00:02:00.800 --> 00:02:01.840
But then I go to the shows.

55
00:02:01.840 --> 00:02:04.160
- Yeah, no, I'm pro piracy all the way.

56
00:02:04.160 --> 00:02:07.840
Like across the board, would you pirate a car?

57
00:02:07.840 --> 00:02:09.760
Yes, you know, if you could.

58
00:02:09.760 --> 00:02:11.840
If one could pirate a car.

59
00:02:11.840 --> 00:02:14.080
- If it was just the classic thing back in the day.

60
00:02:14.080 --> 00:02:19.040
The government-funded anti-piracy initiatives would be like,

61
00:02:19.040 --> 00:02:20.160
would you steal a car?

62
00:02:20.160 --> 00:02:22.960
- Yeah, sure. If I could get away with it.

63
00:02:22.960 --> 00:02:28.880
If it was as easy as you know, pirating IP, I would do it.

64
00:02:28.880 --> 00:02:33.200
- Would you dine and dash from your local diner?

65
00:02:33.200 --> 00:02:34.000
- Never.

66
00:02:34.000 --> 00:02:36.240
- Never, tip 35 percent.

67
00:02:36.240 --> 00:02:37.200
Mike's, come on.

68
00:02:37.200 --> 00:02:39.920
- No, I wouldn't do that.

69
00:02:39.920 --> 00:02:43.440
And if I saw somebody doing that, I'd probably pay for their meal.

70
00:02:43.440 --> 00:02:46.480
- Would you steal a book from the library?

71
00:02:46.480 --> 00:02:47.440
- Never.

72
00:02:49.200 --> 00:02:50.000
- No.

73
00:02:50.000 --> 00:02:53.120
- What do you steal from the Louvre?

74
00:02:53.120 --> 00:02:54.640
- Yes.

75
00:02:54.640 --> 00:02:58.720
- I would not be logistically capable of executing such a fact.

76
00:02:58.720 --> 00:03:02.400
But would I cheer on every news story of people that I see doing it?

77
00:03:02.400 --> 00:03:04.240
Absolutely, absolutely.

78
00:03:04.240 --> 00:03:06.240
- Yeah, I think it's cool.

79
00:03:06.240 --> 00:03:08.640
We got to get back to cool crimes like that.

80
00:03:08.640 --> 00:03:10.480
Like, you know, bank robberies, right?

81
00:03:10.480 --> 00:03:14.960
Stealing priceless artifacts.

82
00:03:14.960 --> 00:03:15.920
Things of that nature.

83
00:03:15.920 --> 00:03:21.600
I feel like that's way cooler than the 7,000th new cryptocurrency scheme

84
00:03:21.600 --> 00:03:22.880
that people are engaging in.

85
00:03:22.880 --> 00:03:25.760
- Would you steal from Whole Foods?

86
00:03:25.760 --> 00:03:27.920
- You want to go first?

87
00:03:27.920 --> 00:03:31.680
- Yes.

88
00:03:31.680 --> 00:03:35.120
And I have under very specific circumstances.

89
00:03:35.120 --> 00:03:37.200
I think that stealing from a big bookstore,

90
00:03:37.200 --> 00:03:38.960
I'll just state my platform.

91
00:03:38.960 --> 00:03:43.120
It's neither very significant as a moral, wrong,

92
00:03:43.120 --> 00:03:46.720
nor is it significant in any way as protest or direct action.

93
00:03:46.720 --> 00:03:49.840
But I did steal from Whole Foods on several occasions.

94
00:03:49.840 --> 00:03:55.280
I've been involved in a neighborhood mutual aid group since 2021.

95
00:03:55.280 --> 00:03:58.000
And so every week I would go get groceries for Miss Nancy,

96
00:03:58.000 --> 00:04:01.920
my now family friend who lived nearby and she wanted to go to Whole Foods.

97
00:04:01.920 --> 00:04:02.960
She wanted food from Whole Foods.

98
00:04:02.960 --> 00:04:04.640
So I was like, okay, great.

99
00:04:04.640 --> 00:04:08.320
And so I'd be getting Miss Nancy all her groceries and then I would finish and be like,

100
00:04:08.320 --> 00:04:09.760
oh my god, four lemons.

101
00:04:09.760 --> 00:04:11.120
I forgot four lemons.

102
00:04:11.120 --> 00:04:13.200
And on several occasions, I was like,

103
00:04:13.200 --> 00:04:15.840
I'm just going to go back grab those four lemons and get the hell out.

104
00:04:15.840 --> 00:04:17.920
- You should go to prison.

105
00:04:17.920 --> 00:04:19.360
- I know, you think they're going to ban me?

106
00:04:19.360 --> 00:04:20.160
- They should ban me.

107
00:04:20.160 --> 00:04:21.520
- They should throw you in jail.

108
00:04:21.520 --> 00:04:23.200
- But I didn't feel bad about it at all.

109
00:04:23.200 --> 00:04:27.680
- And I was part of it because of how you feel about Whole Foods as a corporation.

110
00:04:27.680 --> 00:04:30.160
- Yeah, it already felt like a bit of a compromise.

111
00:04:30.160 --> 00:04:33.440
Like at the time I was like, I had not you been to Whole Foods.

112
00:04:33.440 --> 00:04:36.240
I had sort of, I had a bit more sort of consumer discipline

113
00:04:36.240 --> 00:04:37.680
about where I was spending my money then.

114
00:04:38.240 --> 00:04:42.400
And I already felt like I was in the hole even by shopping there.

115
00:04:42.400 --> 00:04:44.640
And it certainly felt in a utilitarian sense.

116
00:04:44.640 --> 00:04:47.600
I was like, this is not a big deal.

117
00:04:47.600 --> 00:04:49.360
- Well, all right guys.

118
00:04:49.360 --> 00:04:53.040
- I'm pro stealing from big corporations

119
00:04:53.040 --> 00:04:56.800
because they they steal quite a bit more from their own workers.

120
00:04:56.800 --> 00:05:02.080
However, one thing that might even help your ethical dilemma

121
00:05:02.880 --> 00:05:11.760
is the fact that the automated process that they design, these companies know will increase shrink.

122
00:05:11.760 --> 00:05:14.480
Right? So it's actually factored in.

123
00:05:14.480 --> 00:05:19.840
The lemons that you stole are factored into the bottom line of these mega corporations

124
00:05:19.840 --> 00:05:26.000
regardless. And they still end up having increased profit margins because they no longer have to pay

125
00:05:26.000 --> 00:05:30.480
the cashiers that they used to hire as opposed to this automated system.

126
00:05:30.480 --> 00:05:33.360
Knowing full well that people are still going to be able to steal,

127
00:05:33.360 --> 00:05:38.160
still steal a lot more efficiently as a matter of fact through the automated process.

128
00:05:38.160 --> 00:05:43.440
- Totally. Well, also I was looking things like it and shrinkage is a roughly equal internally

129
00:05:43.440 --> 00:05:48.960
as externally. Like they expect it from their employees that they are sort of disenfranchising constantly.

130
00:05:48.960 --> 00:05:53.280
- But what about the argument that if everyone just starts stealing wantonly

131
00:05:53.280 --> 00:05:57.280
from the self-checkout machines, hopeful Whole Foods will eventually raise the prices?

132
00:05:57.280 --> 00:06:06.400
- Yeah. Chaos. Full chaos. Let's go. I mean, look, I'm in favor. I'm in favor of fast and free buses

133
00:06:06.400 --> 00:06:14.080
and also government-owned storefronts. And two of those policies, the mayor of this beautiful

134
00:06:14.080 --> 00:06:18.480
cities is currently working on. - Would you encourage stealing in the same way

135
00:06:18.480 --> 00:06:22.720
from a Mambani run city-owned grocery store with other prices? And why?

136
00:06:22.720 --> 00:06:30.000
- I would not, because I feel like that's taxpayer funded and the prices are this union labor

137
00:06:30.000 --> 00:06:35.520
and the prices are also adjusted regardless. - I think that hypothetical is interesting,

138
00:06:35.520 --> 00:06:39.120
because if you look at it from a categorical imperative type thing, what if everybody did this?

139
00:06:39.120 --> 00:06:48.720
The converse is like, oh, what if every major grocery chain stole from workers and consumers?

140
00:06:48.720 --> 00:06:53.600
And that is basically true, right? Like, it's interesting. Like, I think it speaks to the thing where

141
00:06:53.600 --> 00:06:59.200
a kind of harm committed by the individual strangely continually draws more

142
00:06:59.200 --> 00:07:05.600
higher than the same harm being committed by a structure. And so, I mean, and so I kind of am inclined

143
00:07:05.600 --> 00:07:12.400
towards this. It's like, everyone try it. See what happens. - By the way, ironically enough,

144
00:07:12.400 --> 00:07:20.560
I don't personally do it. I never do it when I was younger. I stole some Pokemon cards from a friend

145
00:07:20.560 --> 00:07:26.880
and my father punished me and it was such a harrowing experience that I've, like, I literally can't even

146
00:07:26.880 --> 00:07:34.160
steal like a candy bar. When we were in college, a lot of my, a lot of my friends used to love doing that.

147
00:07:34.160 --> 00:07:39.440
You know, getting drunk, going to the gas station, five finger discount, I would never participate in it.

148
00:07:39.440 --> 00:07:44.320
And I still can't to this day participate in it. I'm just saying that I personally don't really care.

149
00:07:44.320 --> 00:07:50.240
If someone needs the food, they should absolutely steal it. - There's one thing that's like stealing when

150
00:07:50.240 --> 00:07:54.560
you're a teenager and you want the adrenaline rush and part of it is about testing the rules and

151
00:07:54.560 --> 00:07:59.760
getting away with something. But I feel like what I'm seeing on TikTok and social media is people

152
00:07:59.760 --> 00:08:04.000
saying that they're stealing from Whole Foods, not just for the thrill of it, but out of a feeling of

153
00:08:04.000 --> 00:08:08.640
anger and moral justification because the rich don't play by the rules. So why should I? And

154
00:08:09.280 --> 00:08:13.600
Jeff Bezos has too much money, he's a billionaire. So I should I have to pay for again and call the

155
00:08:13.600 --> 00:08:20.320
Cautos. My friends and I have started calling this micro-looting because it has a, like,

156
00:08:20.320 --> 00:08:24.080
slight political valence, the theft as opposed to just a thrill of getting away with something.

157
00:08:24.080 --> 00:08:28.960
Have you noticed this around you online? Have you noticed more people talking about stealing in this

158
00:08:28.960 --> 00:08:35.840
way? - I mean, I have, I have not seen people talking about micro-looting or such, you know, whatever

159
00:08:35.840 --> 00:08:45.600
action that this is online. But I think, I mean, it kind of speaks to an attenuation of the tactical

160
00:08:45.600 --> 00:08:51.360
language of direct action, you know what I mean? Like, it's like, like, it's like, it doesn't work for

161
00:08:51.360 --> 00:08:56.560
me as a form of direct action because it's, it's concealed, right? Like, any successful direct action

162
00:08:56.560 --> 00:09:02.400
history has to be ostentatious, has to make itself known as ideally collective and this is sort of

163
00:09:02.400 --> 00:09:09.680
necessarily individual and hidden. But I'm like, oh, great. Let's think of ways to, like, let's take

164
00:09:09.680 --> 00:09:13.920
this energy and let's move it into some other thing. Like, I think it's, I think it's great that

165
00:09:13.920 --> 00:09:20.800
the valence of property is kind of on the table as something to be toyed with in terms of direct action.

166
00:09:20.800 --> 00:09:26.640
I feel like we've forgotten there is a long and storied history of sabotage and sort of engagement

167
00:09:26.640 --> 00:09:32.560
with property destruction, even, which is abhorrent to people. I mean, yeah, you remember in 2020,

168
00:09:32.560 --> 00:09:38.400
the like Gucci Chanel stuff in Soho when that was looted. Well, then my PD is investigating a robbery

169
00:09:38.400 --> 00:09:44.000
pattern targeting high and clothing boutiques in Soho. Later, it's happening Tuesday at the Chanel

170
00:09:44.000 --> 00:09:51.040
on Spring Street. That looms so much larger in many sort of Bloomberg liberals imaginations as

171
00:09:51.040 --> 00:09:55.760
profoundly more violent in some ways than the original action being protested, right? And I find

172
00:09:55.760 --> 00:10:00.960
that really interesting. Yeah. I mean, I was, I was thinking about the Boston Tea Party as part of

173
00:10:00.960 --> 00:10:06.960
like that's a political destruction of property. And yet right now it feels like I agree with you,

174
00:10:06.960 --> 00:10:13.120
the looting around the 2020 protests was such a huge talking point. I made people so uncomfortable.

175
00:10:13.120 --> 00:10:18.160
And I'm curious why, like, what do you think the root of that is? I was thinking, you know,

176
00:10:18.160 --> 00:10:24.960
that thieves are actually quite highly valorized and narrative, you know? I mean, Aladdin,

177
00:10:24.960 --> 00:10:36.160
famously. Robyn Hood, yeah. We understand it's, it's well within the collective consciousness

178
00:10:36.160 --> 00:10:37.840
that stealing for need or
